CHILD USA submitted this brief in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees arguing that Twitter knowingly operated as a distributor in the modern Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) marketplace and that they should not be immune from liability under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) Section 230.

[pdf_embed url=”https://childusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Does-v-Twitter-Amicus-Brief-3.pdf”]