M.A. v. THE HONORABLE JOSE PADILLA, ET. AL.
March 17, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Case No. 15-1049

This amicus brief was written in response to Defendant’s claim that preventing him from cross-examining a child plaintiff violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause. Includes issue of whether a pro se child abuser has a rigid right to direct examination of his child victim. The final opinion is State ex. rel. Montgomery v. Padilla, 371 P.3d 642 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).