AMICUS ADVOCACY PROJECT
The Amicus Advocacy Project
An amicus brief comes from the Latin term “amicus curiae” which means “friend of the court.” Although most amicus briefs are persuasively written to support one side of a case, they allow interested, third parties the chance to provide the court with information that is relevant and helpful to the case but that may not otherwise be brought to the court’s attention.
CHILD USA files amicus briefing in cases whose outcomes impact the civil rights of children. We have been delighted to work with numerous attorneys across the United States, and welcome partnerships with law firms to work on pro bono matters with us.
If you are an attorney who needs amicus support or would like your firm to have the opportunity to work on cutting edge amicus briefs involving child protection, please contact us at info@childusa.org.
BRIEFS
DOUGLAS BIENVENU, ET AL. v. DEFENDANT 1 AND DEFENDANT 2
CHILD USA wrote this amicus brief in support Plaintiffs-Respondents and arguing that Louisiana's revival window for child sexual abuse claims--Act 322, as interpreted by Act 386--comports with due process under the Louisiana State Constitution. [pdf-embedder...
MCKINNEY V. THE GASTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
CHILD USA wrote this brief in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and arguing that the SAFE Child Act's revival window is constitutional under the federal and North Carolina state constitutions.
L.F.V., et al v. SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL and THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
In this amicus curiae brief, CHILD USA provides research and analysis regarding Pennsylvania’s state tort immunity exception for child sexual abuse claims, the compelling public interest in permitting all sexual assault claims to proceed against local agencies, the public safety impacts of...
HC LS RT and TK v. James Nesmith
In this amicus brief, CHILD USA argues that The Justice for Vulnerable Victims of Sexual Abuse Act comports with Arkansas' Due Process Clause and is consistent with the national trend to permit revival of previously time-barred claims. [pdf_embed...
Georgeia Kolokithas, on behalf of Jane Doe, a minor, v. Alpena Public School District and Alpena Board of Education,
CHILD USA submitted this amicus brief in support of Plaintiff-Appellant arguing that student-on-student sexual harassment is actionable under Michigan's Elliot-Larson Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) and that a constructive knowledge standard should apply and under which the Alpena school district should...
Robert E. Dupuis, et al., v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland Maine
CHILD USA, together with Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Pine Tree Legal Assistance, Inc. filed this amicus brief in support of Plaintiff-Appellee arguing that the Court should uphold the constitutionality of Maine's revival window provision for victims of child sexual abuse. [pdf_embed...
Q.G v. City of New York, Spence-Chapin Services to Children and Families
CHILD USA wrote this amicus brief in support of Plaintiff-Appellant arguing that blanket governmental immunity is inconsistent with the legislative intent in passing New York's Child Victims Act. [pdf_embed url="https://childusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/FINALQGVCITYOFNY_1-1.pdf"]
JW Doe v. Archdiocese of New Orleans, et. al.
CHILD USA together with CHILD USAdvocacy, The Center for Child Policy, The Kempe Foundation, and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation wrote this brief in support Plaintiff's Motion seeking to unseal the deposition testimony of Lawrence Hecker, a known pedophile living freely in the...
Mark Dolgas v. Donald Wales, Tri-Valley Elementary School, Tri-Valley Central School District, and the Board of Education of the Tri-Valley Central School District
CHILD USA wrote this amicus brief in support of Plaintiff-Appellant arguing that considerations of foreseeability and public policy demand a duty be imposed on educational institutions to compel them to act in furtherance of their child protection responsibilities under New York’s Social Services...