EDUCATION ACCESS
WHAT IS EDUCATIONAL NEGLECT?
WHAT IS EDUCATIONAL NEGLECT?
Educational Neglect is defined as failure
to send child to school/prevent child from getting education (Mennen et al. 2010). Educational neglect has not yet achieved the same level of study or recognition as other forms of child abuse, maltreatment, and neglect. Currently, only twenty-four states (including the District of Columbia) include educational neglect in their definitions of abuse.[1]. CHILD USA is fighting to end educational neglect for children across America, regardless of current state laws. The following all fall under the definition of Educational Neglect:
- Allowing a child to miss too much school
- Failing to enrolling a child in school
- Failing to provide comparable home-based education
- Keeping a child from special education services
2024 National Overview on the State of Children’s Rights to Education in America
At CHILD USA, we believe every child deserves a quality education that leads to a brighter future. Our new report, “National Overview on the State of Children’s Rights to Education in America,” uncovers significant gaps in educational oversight, particularly for children in homeschooling and private school environments.
With 33% of states not recognizing “educational neglect” in their laws, millions of children are at risk of being left behind. Our report provides a comprehensive look at K-12 education across the U.S. and ranks states based on their children’s educational rights protections.
This report is intended to be used as a reference for lawmakers, advocates, researchers, educators, and the public to better understand the existing laws, identify gaps and disparities therein, and develop strategies to protect and enhance children’s educational rights, including but not limited to, adoption of CHILD USA’s policy recommendations.
CHILD USA’s concerns surrounding Educational Neglect
also include children who are not receiving adequate services at schools or in their communities that will ensure they are able to learn when receiving their education. These services include but are not limited to:
- Mental health services
- Medical services
- Adequate food
- Housing
- Adequate technology and wifi
- Restorative justice/trauma-responsive practices
Additionally, CHILD USA is working to help ban corporal punishment in schools as this is an outdated and antiquated practice that harms students and prevents their learning. Join us today in our fight to end educational neglect for children!
[1] Child Welfare Information Gateway. “Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect” https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/define.pdf (last visited 9.10.20)
Writings and Resources
Advancing the Right to Education in 2024 and Beyond
Torah Bontrager was born and raised traditional Amish and escaped at age 15. In 2018, she founded The Amish Heritage Foundation, which is a nonprofit committed to empowering Amish women and children through education past the 8th grade and fostering public awareness...
On Educational Neglect – Amanda Lorentson’s CHILD USA Story
This blogpost was written for CHILD USA by Amanda Lorentson, a survivor of educational neglect. Despite the immense obstacles in her path, Amanda went on to attend an Ivy League law school and is currently an attorney for Kline...
Corporal punishment is still common in American schools. Here’s why it should be banned.
Marci Hamilton, founder and CEO of CHILD USA, advocates in USA Today for the urgent cause of banning corporal punishment in public schools. She begins by citing a shocking incident in Florida where a 6-year-old student was beaten by her school principal with a wooden...
Amicus Advocacy
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Data on Educational Neglect
- 8% (Mennen et al. 2010) – 47% of neglected children experience educational neglect (Sedlack et al. 2010).
- Nationally, 3.5% of children (1.7 million) are unenrolled in requisite education (Kelly, 2010)
Important Articles on Educational Neglect
Child neglect: Definition and identification of youth’s experiences in official reports of maltreatment
Ferol E. Mennen*,a, Kihyun Kimb, Jina Sanga, and Penelope K. Tricketta
Objective—The purpose of this study was to describe the nature of neglect in child welfare clients, to describe these experiences, to examine its typologies, and to understand how different types of neglect co-occurred with each other and with other types of maltreatment.
Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4)
Andrea J. Sedlak, Jane Mettenburg, Monica Basena, Ian Petta, Karla McPherson, Angela Greene, & Spencer Li
Background and Objectives: The National Incidence Study (NIS) is a congressionally mandated, periodic effort of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. In 1974, Public Law (P.L.) 93–247 mandated the first NIS (NIS–1), which collected data in 1979 and 1980. The NIS–2 was mandated under P.L. 98–457 (1984) and collected data in 1986. The NIS–3, mandated by the Child Abuse Prevention, Adoption, and Family Services Act of 1988 (P.L. 100–294) and the Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, Adoption and Family Services Act of 1992 (P.L. 102–295), collected data in 1993. The Keeping Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-36) mandated the NIS–4, which collected data in 2005 and 2006. The principal objectives of the NIS–4 were to provide updated estimates of the incidence of child abuse and neglect in the United States and measure changes in incidence from the earlier studies.
Where are the Children? Educational Neglect across the Fifty States
Phillip Kelly
This paper explores the extent to which states are meeting their obligation to provide adequate educations for their minor citizens. It reveals the current mismatch between children identified in the federal census and those enrolled in any form of schooling. Currently, approximately 1.7 million children (3.5% nationwide) within compulsory education age ranges are not enrolled with any type of educational institution. Hawaii, at 17.5%, has the largest percentage of “missing children.” These “missing” children lie at the intersection of two policy implementing bodies, departments of education and departments of health and welfare. Unfortunately, most states cannot reconcile the number of children that should be educated. At a minimum, this is necessary to meet the democratic intent of compulsory education statutes.
PACE Program addresses racial disparity while saving county funds
Michigan students facing educational neglect is a ‘hidden problem’
by Lily Altavena | March 30, 2022
Former state official alleges Rhode Island neglects vulnerable students’ special-ed needs
by Katie Mulvaney | January 13, 2022