TEXAS
CHILD SEX ABUSE SOLs
CURRENT CIVIL SOL
CSA: The civil SOL for CSA claims against all defendants is age 48 with a very narrow discovery rule.
Trafficking: The civil SOL for trafficking claims against all defendants is age 48.
CSAM: The civil SOL for CSAM claims is age 20.
CIVIL SOL SNAPSHOT
AGE CAP | CSA: AGE 48 TRAFFICKING: AGE 48 CSAM: AGE 20 |
REVIVAL LAW | NONE |
DISCOVERY TOLLING | 30 DAYS |
Civil SOL History
Age Cap | |
2002 | CSA SOL of age 23 (age of majority, 18, plus 5 years).[i] Trafficking and CSAM SOLs of age 20 under general personal injury and minority tolling statutes (age of majority, 18, plus 2 years).[ii] |
2007 | Added the offense of continuous sexual abuse of a child to its CSA SOL.[iii] |
2011 | Added the offense of trafficking and prostitution to its CSA SOL.[iv] |
2015 | Extended CSA SOL to age 33 (age of majority, 18, plus 15 years).[v] |
2019 | Extended CSA SOL to age 48 (age of majority, 18, plus 30 years).[vi] |
Revival Law | |
N/A | No window or other SOL revival law. |
Discovery | |
Common Law | Although there is a common law discovery rule in Texas running from a victim’s discovery of abuse, it has not yet successfully tolled the SOL for sexual abuse claims.[vii] To apply the discovery rule, a court must find that “the alleged wrongful act and the resulting injury are inherently undiscoverable at the time they occurred but may be objectively verified.”[viii] Additionally, the plaintiff need only know of the abuse and the injury, not their causal connection, before the discovery rule is triggered.[ix] |
Statutory | In 1995, Texas added a very narrow statutory discovery rule that gives a plaintiff thirty days after “discover[ing] the identity of the defendant” to amend a previously filed petition with the court.[x] The discovery rule applies to individual perpetrators and to institutional defendants, but not to the government.[xi] |
[i] Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.0045 (2002) (five-year SOL).
[ii] Id. at §§ 16.001, 16.003.
[iii] Id. at § 16.0045 (2007) (five-year SOL).
[iv] Id. (2011) (five-year SOL).
[v] Id. (2015) (fifteen-year SOL).
[vi] Id. (2019) (thirty-year SOL).
[vii] Doe v. St. Stephen’s Episcopal Sch., 382 F.Appx. 386, 388 (5th Cir. 2010) (noting that “[t]he Texas Supreme Court has not directly addressed the question of whether all sexual abuse cases are inherently undiscoverable, but other Texas courts have found that the discovery rule does not apply uniformly to these cases”); S.V. v. R.V., 933 S.W.2d 1, 25–26 (Tex. 1996) (concluding that the legislature did not prescribe application of the discovery rule in sexual abuse cases). But see Rollins, supra note 922 (questioning the accuracy of the scientific opinion on repressed memories which S.V. v. R.V. was predicated on).
[viii] Dinardo, supra note 921, at 810 (citing L.W. v. L.S, No. 03-96-00535, 1997 WL 634343, at *3 (Tex. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 1997)).
[ix] Doe v. Linam, 225 F.Supp.2d 731, 735 (S.D. Tex. 2002).
[x] Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.0045(d) (2021).
[xi] King-White v. Humble Indep. Sch. Dist., 803 F.3d 754, 760–61, 764 (5th Cir. 2015).
CURRENT TEXAS CIVIL LAW
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 16.0045 - Limitations Period for Claims Arising from Certain Offenses
Case law
S.V. v. R.V., 933 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1996) (Texas has found the discovery rule to apply only if “the alleged wrongful act and resulting injury were inherently undiscoverable at the time they occurred but may be objectively verified)
Marshall v. First Baptist Church, 949 S.W.2d 504, 507 (Tex. App. 1997) (holding that the discovery rule did not apply because the victim had reported the abuse and therefore had “discovered the wrongful acts”).
Doe v. Linam, 225 F. Supp. 2d 731, 735-36 (S.D. Tex. 2002) (holding that the discovery rule did not apply because the plaintiff knew both of the abuse and of his emotional and psychological problems)
Adams v. YMCA, 265 S.W.3d 915, 917-18 (Tex. 2008) (To bring a suit, it is not necessary for the victim to connect the abuse to any subsequent psychological injuries or understand the full extent of his injuries.)
Doe v. St. Stephen’s Episcopal Sch., 382 Fed. Appx. 386, 388-389,(5th Cir. Tex. 2010).
CURRENT CRIMINAL SOL
CSA: There is no SOL for some CSA offenses. The SOL is age 38 for sexual performance, and the SOL is 3 years from the offense for any remaining felonies and two years from the offense for misdemeanors.
Trafficking: There is no SOL for trafficking offenses.
CSAM: The SOL for CSAM violations is 7 years from the offense.
CRIMINAL SOL SNAPSHOT
CSA | NO SOL |
TRAFFICKING | NO SOL |
CSAM | 7 YEARS FROM OFFENSE |
Criminal SOL History
Age Cap | |
2002 | Age 28 for sexual assault and indecency with a child unless there was DNA evidence, which eliminated the SOL.[i] The SOL for remaining felonies, including CSAM, was 3 years from the offense or 2 years for misdemeanors, and were not subject to the DNA evidence rule.[ii] |
2003 | Added new crime of trafficking of persons, including child sex trafficking, which fell under the 3-year SOL.[iii] |
2007 | Eliminated the SOLs for felony sexual assault, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and indecency with a child. Also, extended the SOL to age 38 for sexual performance of a child under age 17.[iv] |
2011 | Eliminated the SOL for some sex trafficking offenses and added the crime of compelling prostitution to its age 38 SOL.[v] |
2015 | Eliminated the SOL for compelling prostitution.[vi] |
2023 | Extended the SOL for sexual performance of a child age 17 to age 38, and possession or promotion of CSAM to 7 years from the offense.[vii] Added felony offense of child grooming with an SOL of 3 years from the offense.[viii] |
[i] Id. at § 12.01 (2002).
[ii] Id. at § 12.02 (2002) (two-year SOL).
[iii] Id. (2003); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20A.02 (2003) (trafficking of persons).
[iv] Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. § 12.01 (2007).
[v] Id. (2011).
[vi] Id. (2015).
[vii] Id. (2023).
[viii] Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 15.032 (2023) (child grooming).
CURRENT TEXAS CRIMINAL LAW
Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. § 12.01 - Felonies
Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. § 12.02 - Misdemeanors
Case Law
The information provided is solely for informational purposes and is not legal advice. To determine the Texas SOL in a particular case, contact a lawyer in the state.
Last Updated: November 15, 2023